Search for: "Rasier"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 6:47 am
The complaint also alleges that Uber and Rasier, the companies that employed the drivers, certified to Hirease, the company that procured consumer reports for them, that they would give pre-adverse action notices to all job applicants. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:49 pm
El Tribunal de Apelaciones emitió durante la tarde de hoy, la decisión respecto a apelación que presentara Uber de Puerto Rico y Rasier LLC para que se revocara injunction que paralizó las operaciones de la empresa en la isla. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:20 am
In the audit of Uber and Rasier, NJDOL examined the companies’ books over a five-year period, 2014-2018. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 1:00 pm
Uber and Rasier will appeal, and there are defenses available. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 1:00 pm
Uber and Rasier will appeal, and there are defenses available. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 6:20 am
On July 29, Rasier emailed him two background reports compiled by Hirease, LLC. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:46 am
According to Uber’s website, “Uber is a technology company that has developed an app that connects users (riders) with third party transportation providers. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:49 am
The California agency has opened a penalty consideration case against Rasier-CA, which operates as Uber. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:35 pm
In a lawsuit filed in April against Uber, its wholly owned subsidiary Rasier LLC, and Tamim, the Robinsons cliam that the driver’s negligence behind the wheel caused them injuries. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:19 am
Instead, they are paid by Rasier LLC. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:54 pm
Uber thinks companies should be “incentivised, not penalised, for helping independent workers access training, as well as other perks and benefits”. [1] Mr Michail Kaseris v Rasier Pacific V.O.F [2017] FWC 6610. [2] Aslam and others v Uber B.V. and others [2017] IRLR 4 (ET). [3] Mr Michail Kaseris v Rasier Pacific V.O.F [2017] FWC 6610 [48]. [4] Ibid [51]. [5] Idem.… [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 pm
RASIER-DC, LLC, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 8:12 am
The full citation of the judgment is: E TŪ INCORPORATED v RASIER OPERATIONS BV [2022] NZEmpC 192 [25 October 2022] and can be found here. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 1:12 am
The full citation of the judgment is: E TŪ INCORPORATED v RASIER OPERATIONS BV [2022] NZEmpC 192 [25 October 2022] and can be found here. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Plaintiffs argued that this coverage was illusory, in that the named insured was a third party subsidiary of Uber, Rasier LLC, and coverage was available only if Rasier was found liable for injuries sustained in the accident; and also Uber had no insurable interest in passengers, since it claimed not to be a transportation company. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
., and Rasier-CA, LLC (collectively, “Uber”), under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA), Labor Code section 2698 et seq. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 8:49 am
’s widow filed a wrongful death lawsuit, and named Uber and Rasier LLC as defendants. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 10:23 am
Nov. 30, 2022), concerned a class action for claims against Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC (collectively “Uber”). [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 10:23 am
., a Delaware corporation, and Rasier – CA LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, case no. 11-46739 EK). [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 8:49 am
’s widow filed a wrongful death lawsuit, and named Uber and Rasier LLC as defendants. [read post]
